HomeMy WebLinkAbout010-171-00-3805-VAR-2012-013 �ce of
Sawyer County Zoning and Conservation Administration
10610 Main Street Suite 49 � ,
Hayward,Wisconsin 54843 �
(715)63482R8 ,- _ .
October 18,2012
To:Town Clerk—Town of Hayward
Re:Variance Application#12-013—Frederick&Mary Clazke Residence Trust
Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, October 16,2012 the Sawyer County Zoning Board of
Appeals denied the appGcation for variance for the following proposal:
Town of Haywazd-Frederick&Mary Clazke Residence Trust c/o George Clarke,Trustee Part of Lot 38
and Part of Lot 39,Round Lake Park Subdivision;523,T 41N,R 8W;Pazcel 3803. Property has 2.79
acres.Property is zoned Residential/Recreational One.Application is for a reduced side lot line setback for
an eicisting dwelling.An application has been made with the Sawyer County Zoning Committee to create a
new lot which would result in the dwellings side yard setback of S.Y at its closest point.Variancc is re-
quested as Section 18.4(a),Dimensional Requirements,Sawyer County Zoning Ordiiuwce,would require
the prior granting of a variance for any structure located closer than 10'from one side lot line and at least
30'from the other side lot line.The Town Board has approved the application with comments.
Findings of Fact of the Board of Appeals:It would be for the convenience of the owner;it
would be the basis of economic gain and it would be a self-created hardship.
Any person or persons jointly aggrieved by ttris decision of the Boazd of Appeals may commence
an action in the Circuit Court for Writ of Certiorari to review the legality of ttris decision within
30 days after the date of this notice.
Yours truly,
�`?�'1
Cind�
\
Deputy Zoning Administrator
Town of Hayward
County of Sawyer
Aug� st 1, ?012
Date
SUBJECT: Variance Application — Side Lot Setback
To: Sawyer County Zoning & Conservation Administration
10610 Main Street Suite 49
Hayward, Wisconsin 54843-0668
Owner: Frederick & Mary Clarke Residence Trust (George Clarke) 703-855-1822
Address: 10613N Peninsula Rd, Hayward, WI 54843 �J� ��.,; '_'; k zr
Anticipated time of presentation (minutes) to the Board of Appeals (Circle one) : 15 15-30 />3�)
L�:�ti� . _ .�Q , �(`nk� �b� l t�
Property description: S 23, T 41N, R 08W
Round Lake Park, Prt Lot 38 & Prt Lot 39
010-171-00-3803, Parcel -4.38.3, Plat of Survey 23418-38
#10613N Peninsula Road
Volume and page no. of deed: WD #239832
Acreage and lot size: 2.79 acres
Zone district: ResidentiaURecreational One (RR-1)
ApplicaHon is for: The reduced side lo line setback for an existing primary dwelling. By creation of a new lot
the existing primary dwelling would b 5.2' o the side lot line at the closest point.
Variance is requested as: Section 18.4(a) Dimensional Requirements, Sawyer County Zoning Ordin<<nce
would require the prior granting of a variance for any structure located closer than 10' from one side lct line and
at least 30' from the other side lot line.
�� , 1� � �(71.01 �/Z � S��'
,
�2c'/]�c�Z-rcK � /��4r2� C1_,4c2t�C� l�5 �0�
�2-uS Y-
Name and address of agent: Signatures of property owner and agent and/c�r
None purchaser. The above hereby make applicatiun for a
variance. The above certify that the listed ini ormation
and intentions are true and conect. The abo�e
person/s/ hereby give permission for access t�� the
property for onsite inspections.
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
SAWYER COUNTY BOARD OF APPEALS
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(To be completed by applicant)
Completed by Geor�e G Clarke
(First Name) (MI) (Last Name)
The purpose of this form is to provide you with information that pertains to the granting
of"azea/dimensional"variances and to assist you in preparing for your presentation
before the Sawyer County Board of Appeals. Use additional paper for responses if
required. Example responses are not related to any variance ever reviewed by the
Board of Appeals. This form will become a part of your application packet and is to
be returned to the Zoning Department by the variance application deadline.
Part 1. Appiica�t supplied Ir�formation.
Current use of your�ro�ert�improvements - (e.g., "Property contains a residential
home with a detached garage.").
On 2.7 acres and 312+/-feet along the meander line fronting on Round Lake are
located a:
1) three-season, one-bedroom cabin (1326 sq.ft., appro�) that is over 60
years old,
2) a guest dormitory over a wet-slip boathouse(built 1952) and
3) a 2-car garage.
The northern third of the property is unimproved, lake frontage(105'+along
the lakeshore).
Describe the variance requested—(e.g., "Add a 15' x 20' addition to the side of the
home.")
Request approva[of two area variances that will allow subdivision of the
southwestern two-thirds of Round Lake Park Lot 38 into two parcels of relatively
equal width (99.8'and 100; respective[y):
1) Lot Width - The newly established lot wi[l be 100 feet wide on a
perpendicular to the side lot line throughout. The remaining, e.zisting lot
will be reduced to 99.8 feet wide at the lakeshore (only 2.4 inches less
than the zoninQ standard) and 99.09 feet wide at Peninsula Road. Both
[ots shall be deemed to be equal to 100 feet with respect to meeting the
Sawyer County Zoning requirements.
2) Existing Cabin Setback- The NW corner of the cabin on the remaining
property will be approximately 5.2 feet from the new property line which
is 4 8 feet less than the 10 foot zonin�standard The NE corner of the
cabin will be approximately 10.4 feet from the new properry line.
Page 1 of 5 6 August 2012
Describe the effects on the propertv if the variance is not eranted—(e.g.,"The addition
is required for year-round living and protecting property value.").
Approval ojthis area variance app[ication wi[I preserve the property value
consistent with other properties on Peninsula Road according to a recent
appraisal and the advice of severa[realtors and other rea[estate professianals.
In today's market,the majority ojRound Lake buyers prejer m purchase
proper[ies that are equal to or about 100'. Noi granting this application would
diminish the va[ue of the property.
Describe alternafives to the requested variance such as other locations desiQns and
construction techniques Attach a site map showinQ aiternatives that vou considered in
each cateaory below.
a) Altematives you considered that will comply with existing sta�dards. If
you find such an alternative,you may move forward with this option
with a regular permit. If you rejected compliar�t alternatives,provide
the reasons that you rejected them.
(e.g,"Space is�ot available to expand in any other direction or
locatio�. House is too close to the side lot lines and the lake:'
No comnliant alternatives exist due to the survey slaking error 100 years ago.
b) Altematives you considered that require a lesser variance and reasons
you rejected them.
(e.g.,"Addition is the minimum size that is required.").
No lesser akernatives e.zist
Describe the impact on vour property and adiacent properties if the variance is�ranted.
(e.g.,"Erosion during constructio�—will be controlled with silt fencing.
After construction there will be a greater impervious surface area.
Gutters and downspouts will be used to divert water away from other properties
and the lake. Shoreline buffer zone will be planted with native vegetation,trees
and skuubs:').
There is no adverse impact to this or adjacent properties resulting from approva[
of the new lot line.
The course of the intended development of the Peninsula Road neighborhood
wil[not be altered
Page 2 of 5 6 August 2012
Part 2: Three-Step Test.
To qualify for your requested variance, you must demonstrate that your property meets
the following three requirements. This is known as the "three-step test."
1) Unique Propertv Limitations.
Uoique physical limitations of the property such as steep slopes or wetlands
that are not generally shared by other properties must prevent compliance
with ordinance requirements. The circumstances of an applicant(growing
family, need for a larger garage etc.) are not a factor in deciding variances.
Nearby ordinance violations, prior variances or lack of objections from
neighbors or the Town Board do not provide a basis for graoting a variance.
Do unique physical characteristics of your property prevent compliance with
the ordinance?
� Yes. Where are they located on your property? Please show the
boundaries of these features on the site map that you used to describe
alternatives considered.
(e.g., "There is a wetland area that extends around one side of the house
and also behind the house.
The necessity of these variances originated 100 years ago when the precision of
surveying p�actices was less than today's capabilities.
Refer to the August 1912 survey by surveyor Harry Johnson—Note that Section
23,Lots 37-41 were all intended to be 300'in width along what is now called
Peninsula Rd.
In fact, lots 38& 39 are only 598.27feet wide, not 600, along Peninsula Rd
according to the August 1995 survey by surveyor Richard Stowe. Similarly, a
1977 survey by Ronald L. Peterson calculated the width of the two lots to be
598.52 feet versus the intended 600 feeL
Properly deeds in the 1950's and 1960's customari[y referred to "whole",
"northern/southern halj"or "noRhern/southern XX feet of Lot XX" based on
the assumption that the as-staked lot widths were equa[to the distances on the
1912 Round Lake p[at by Harry Johnson.
It's a reasonable assumption that when establishing the 100'[ot width standard
for Round Lake, planners expected that all 300'lots (as shown on historica[
surveys) could be ultimate[y divided into three separate lots on which conforming
improvements would be permitted.
Therefore, it would be contrary to the planners'intent and an undue hardshiD if
Sawyer County Zoning does not approve this area variance application for a new
lot line the result of which is to divide Lot 38 into three relativelv equal lots
whose sum total width is 299J6'at lhe lakeshore and 298J9'along Peninsula
� Page 3 of 9 6 August 2012
Road A[I three[ots comprising the original Round Lake Park Lot 38 will be
more than 99%of the 100 foot standard width.
It is import¢nt to note that each of the trvo sub-divided lots resulting from thes
variance will be capable of ineeting all other setback and Zoning requirements
for normal, approved RR-I use.
❑ No. A vazia�ce cannot be granted.
2) No Harm to Public Interests.
A variance may not be granted which results in harm to public interests. In
applying this test,the Board of Appeals must consider impacts of your
proposal and the cumulative impacts of similar projects on the interests of t6e
neighbors and the entire community. Some, but not necessarily all of these
considerations are: (1)Public health, safety and welfare, (2) water quality,
(3) fish and wildlife habitat, (4)natural scenic beauty, (5) minimization of
property damages and (6) achievement of eventual compliance for
nonconforming uses, structures and lots.
Explain how the granting of this variance would not harm the public interests
ar how it may even enhance the public interests.
Approval of this variance will not increase the potential maYimum
number ojproperry owners along Peninsu[a Road relative to what the
current standards intend nor dimenish the value of the contiguous
propeRies.
The new[y established!ot will allow a new owner to construct a year-
round home according to county zoning standards. A new property
owner and a new home will increase the value of this property, increase
the Counry's property tax base, lncrease property tax revenues and
increase revenue for local businesses.
3) Urmecessary Hardship.
An applicant may not daim hardship because of conditions which are self-
imposed or created by a prior owner(for example, excavating a pond on a
vacant lot and then arguing that there is no suitable location for a home.).
Courts have also determined that economic or financial hardship does not
justify a variance. When determining whether u�necessary hardship exists,
the propeRy as a whole is considered rather than j ust a portion of the parcel.
You are applying for an "area variance.' An area variance relaxes a
dimensional standard such as a setback, frontage, lot area, or height. For an
azea vaziance, unnecessary hardship exists when would unreasonably prevent
the owner from usine the propertv for a permitted Durpose or would render
Page 4 of 5 6 August 2012
conformitv with such restrictions unnecessarilv burdensome. The
importance of the public purposes of the ordinance, the degree to which the
restriction suppoRs those purposes and the extent of the relaxation of the
restriction are weighs against the limitations full compliance would impose
on use ofthe property.
Is unnecessary hardship present?
� Yes. Describe.
The optimal property line results in a need for granting of two minor variances
for issues that conllict with the[etter ojtoday's zoning standards but are
otherwise totallv consistent with the sDirit of land utilization in the Round Lake
community.
Lat Width -
The 99.8'Lot width is the result of imprecision of surveying practices and
equipment one hundred years ago relative to today's capabilities.
Reasonab[e and fair application ojtoday's 100'bui[dable standard would allow a
variance because the original staking of the lots did not meet the intended 300'
per IoL The variance process ezists to adjust for extraordinary circumstances
such as a IJ3 inch shonage in the ptacement of survey stakes 100 years ago.
More�ecently, 100 feet was established as the minimum standard width for a
buildable lot. Logic wou[d say th¢t the I00 foot standard was based on i1 being
easy-to-implement since it is one-third of the origina[300'lots and&allows the
opportuniry to meet the high-demand for Round Lake properry ownership.
Cabin Setback—
The need for a variance is a resu[t of the optima!property[ine decision
independent of the location of the cabin that was modestly improved 60 years ago.
This substandard condition is temnorary and will likely be cured by a future
owner,perhaps within five years. The property on which is[ocated the cabin and
dormitory/boathouse is already listed for sale.
While the cabin is well maintained, its vintage Northwood's style is sub par
relative to the preference of most of today's Round Lake property buyers.
Therefore, a new owner wi111ikely construct a new home at which time the
bedroom setback variance wou[d probably be cured by removing/mod�ing the
bedroom.
❑ No. A variance cannot be granted.
Page 5 of 5 6 August 2012
Sawyer County Zoning Administration `ti o � O
� � � �
Inspection Report w � C :;
� �
� =,
b z
Owner(s) Frederick & Mary Clarke Residence Trust (George Clazke) � � n
r
Address 4426 Chalfont PL Bethesda MA 20816 ° � �
£� -� m
AgentlPurchaser "
� '7
Address � ,4�i
Bldr/Plber/CST � �
r7
�
Address n
x
Inspection � Private ❑ Public Violation ❑ Zoning ❑ Sanitation R�
�
� Dwelling ❑ Mobile Home ❑ Commercial ❑ Garage ❑ Addition �, �
� Setback - Lake ❑ Setback - Road � Setback - Lot Line ❑ Soils Verification � �-C
� Variance Re uired for lesser side lot line setbacks <�
�' o
TrusteeS Deed#273722 RR-I 2.79 Acres Plat of Survey 23418-38 #10613N Peninsula Road � o
� M
� x
a
d �
r �
�
� �
� b
o, a
�
x
� X
('
4,
� O
t1 .��.
_ p C'
r^� _ - - � �
� �� �
^ �" ` o, �.
rn
n
�
O
�
� O
�`},� � � IA
� O
� I
w
. �
0
w
�
�
�`Se�. a '���
A+fi►�kL ��
�
� IW
8
� 55�,+� Se�'I"``�' bn o. -�
� �a�. :an� {'C�u;f'ec� � � � �
e� new � �r � cc�r�ie,d S�� �oi- � y,� . � z
�
�
�
�
w �
� o
w �
Discussed with George Clarke Dale Olson & Jay Kozlowski �
Date & Time 07/09/12 2:00 PM
Signature ofIn�pP�f�r /� .
��
� �
� J
� � � -
� i
� hi�
� �.
� �
� � � �
� .� a � _`"�7 I
�' �
� � �
D
� � �
� _ . _ _ - C3
� �t�k2�S �as ,ot _ _ " _ _. ._. - �
� --- _ - - Z
�- -- O
�
i
� p i �
� v- + �
� .Rbb � =L96
� I
� � �
� _ _ �
(� � ?i��91�?o�s �O� - - - - - - � i
I 1
1� h�
lT� 1
�
o �-- �� �07 ' ----- - �
� i
�
�
�
\
��
. 1
i
, �b � � _
� a � J-"� �
'
�
; a �
�
-- �
�
0
' � j--
( �
1 �
� �
,
1
�
�
�� _ ------�---
�� -�°7
_ �
�S�tbacks at eaves ofi existing cabin bedroorn:____ � �.�-�.t�,�: ��,:�c ,• , �L��Y-- ,: - �_. - ..
NW corner = 5.2� RiCHAi20 A. S701YE DATE
NE carner - 10.4' REGi ST�R�D LAND Sl1RVEYOR
- WISCON5IN REG. N0. S-1775
NOR �t NE OF MN 1/4 aF SECT t ON 23 .. N I/1 O�RNER-
�/� _,____ ...�-.-�..
�'_'' ' ••"` V .. 8y. 14'12'E 2b39.2r' o� s�ioN 2� -
� � ,�
S�ECT�23 . . �,
.. �' -
� BEARING 6 DISTANCE bF TOTAL PROPERTY AS SURED �
LOT LIHE TO LOi LINE - N 45'20'� 31l F7. M E OR LESS. `r�
BEAR 1 NGS � D�S7ANCES OF TNREE SECiMEIVTS AS ��' "s ��T \��,,
lJ�ASURED AT SNORE LlNE SYARTINO WITH SOUTN vP t� �o � oF o
SEOMENT ARE AS FOLLOW: . t� rO '�0• N \�
�°� '% .
� � s $ C � �_ ��T�
N 35• 13'£ 10�'+/- � ���
r! 48•35'£ I 45'+/- s0' `s'Al. Fr
� N 51'32'E 107'+/- �, o�ci►eiN� ��� 'r �?' �, 53�0 \�� �
.1" �
t��
4-pJ o� s.'�. \s.
99.8' �� �s�.� 100� s'`�3• I
� 4
`y, .a/ ���� �p�•• '�, ,l'
� • `��• �'S 4�
�� ''•• �°'-A�d •�. 2 �J
� Nsi .__.. ___._., �. �
��"' .., ?'sl;.y 'i��,�`; �F: ' �
, _d�� � q� •., �_._._� �p. �.� �
•.
aa, �� `� ���, C�'�e F,t�� ���� •�'�.� $ � °!��" �
•� �o �I� . �� ��2 a� �---
i ��_ .,� �,:/
� 40�/ '��ld �L�
<ar �R��g� J(P�' � -.' '�Q s �
�
�'c c,s�"�o• �6o•a9 A [�_�e_7 �i,� 99.09'
i.EGEND • f�p 3-• !_.__. _.._� �'�. ho, ��-__...
0 3/4' X 30' i RON 6AR SET �.�.'T � Qp3 �,`� h�
�!.�• •22. �,
• 3/4' t RON BAR FOUfJD �
!e , �"1 C��3� !
� SAwY�R COU:�TY CORNER p0 �-�W-�'
o SEP7 I C �tENT 95 � a�
��'.�
� COHCRET� SEPTIC LlD � `�
�.
/ .
i
SCALE - i- - 1 fi6'
BEARINGS REFERENCED TQ 7HE NOR7F! LINE 0� /
�a e 12 8Q0 l OQ 2O0 THE NW {/4 dF S�CT{Oh1 23 ASSliMED 70 BEAR
9 N 87' 14` 12'E..
--------- --^ �_,
.._ .,. ,._ ...., , ----�-------------
.. � : --------------------------------i
,:
ws�c�p9e,,,��� I
9L iF
�
�
'
''*� �
�
!
�5 ./ �
�
KREVER .�--._.r.� , /�� i
'''1 �
� ,� I
_ _ �
;;'%/�: �
�''' �
�
/ � ,�//�/////��� ...Rl '
/" %7 ��j�'� � RD ' ---------
�
�' f-� _�; �— �--------------------_ _ .._
��/ , / _ _
� /
i. ,
� //// / / /� �i� �
% , � ,, //� �/�; Rou�d �
,. .,/ , ,/� ��
�� // ;,: =
�� �!% ,/; � i, ��
% ;//// / // �N��N -
;; ,� //�/j� /;,, ,. LQ��" �
j�; � '.;j� /�jj �� ' ;.. f.
'r ; ,/,,�,i/�/ , / ,/ , , � �
i //� ��/� , - ;Ql � � �� �
; �/i,/,//,%/�% ';� "� � �
/ s���. % � ..�
��, �
%:: ` �
�; :,-- a s
�
� � P.YL. �,y
»pN rk ,�. �
QF }
ISULA RD ^^F�R �1� �
P� �
�
Q b �
� �
�. Q
0
�' 0 j
�':� v �.�-*ti �i5,'�',:.;.... �<
/.� . . .._� =-. ., .
�, ......, ..,. - �:
`�� �� �N,jE OEpP AVE- . '�
,;;� � � Q-iSf RC
� .,,� � �� �� �
' �.
/�' PHEL<+N�� .. �
i`---�
i: � O
� � �ERSO��,` p �
/ ' � � y
N B/R H lN , �o S v��,RD �.i�� '
� pM
�
x 4�P �� �
AVf
RD
f Z MO/,'F
'j�////// � � (�No
� � ,/ � ����� �� �
��'�%� '!�/ // %: w y
;/� /� // 1
� �f � �"� z
/ �, n
/ : � // M> z �
.' /� / / _�_.._.__�i z U �'Sr s
. � � / ,/ : � � �,,�
/ . ,' / ,;,; ,
/ '� / i;:" �' m' -,
� ';/ , //i /�%' °� �
� ; / ; ;!�/,i,.//, _ _
'/ / / ,�== ,, .�.��/, �: =b�' �:
; j�//; � �a ..;�� ,� �;:
, ,. -/, � , .�, �
�. . _� � , � z '
�
'�.< < __=�, . �Q {� „ :
-----. ------ := NASKINS.RD , -V �, Ro� OH . ,�
_--�-�—,.�--,-
,�, f
� '/� `-- , '�Cqy� a
� , � �.._._r.. �
i ��.g�`� i` �,� 9y �
�� �R � --- � c.
` �' ' '- ��yo
� o
, �'� p
j j Y 7 �...-`QPDIN; ���-Lo,., ��
J-�, �}�:� � �
%� � � � � �
� � FRO RD ,r%.'<
�
� � a.s
I
— J � �����"r
i '� � ��
� - �� , � �
F Q �� ' , . �
e�coN w a N ry ` �
BACON T I FQ Z � _.--� .' ) -. -
� 3 : u �a,,,ed �--., C .
W/+TER TDWER LN HIG ST ?( ��'�'�
� � <:,� � . `sr�
�uduivi�iuN 3 001'V � Possible overla in ad acent r�
� j _ m / LOTS 1 THRU ,g YG.L. 7 oa,���: O �\ SURVEYS DIS P I
32 bo7 PLSS DATA. P2fCEl M2
i' �~°° _ �1 ev eEsr-Fir a�084119(4302� pped ID Number(4;
j' _ � 33 �°,O`�• oo��p0 \ PURPOSEs Otv s�s���a� Recorded Mapped documeN�
�`�.� . o�o"',� \ w.a� nc Mapped Acreage of parcel(Nc
O10-ea�-11 2302 . �2 ,4, �•T�� \ C ..-��-+w� �
°. �*�� \ ---- PLSSSectionLine
' �/ ^�,����� . �� , 25 ,� � PLSS Quarler Section Line
/ 34 � m � PLSS�uarter-Quarier and Go�
�' •-�I, „�,,,�, '" µ���� � — PLSS Meander Line
s '.,b � / . 24 �
oio-en-s�s�- �' .�..v 53�� �l :..�35\ �.�.m _— _----
i� � \
/" �yol
�32� � - — °-• m 23 y ��
..,..v», .e.,�.�36 `„�. i .
�,,,.. . -23oz
• ,�11i�,a�Q� �n�RsroN G.L. 6
,e....,., 2z..,r� � �i
• :U e �. 1.t_C �,r., !
a..._v,., _ _ . e R 1 3� ' rne �
G.L. 3 =� —5 3Z) g - . � � ;
� v u, � .
� � 21 �m �n
_� 3 �� 5 G" _ u,"` � _S 3�S 1� I
22 3� _ y ` \
/
,u� v = � \ ��.� � ' �� _g� ��_
\ ,,,.. . �...,.v,.. � � l'��n� Pn rn n1:�p 1 1�, � qt'ldR.�n / j - ----.
�� - = _ ' �wr�
� __ _ - . � , 40 �
�� 2 -- 5� I , • , ; `
� .,r�� 3 � ....�� ���_ / /
� d � ,.
�~ ' p ':`.\ � ) • _
�
' ` _ °'� " �°`' / �- 4, L / .r__ DATE OF PHOTO: �
� —_ n�� f • a \ E � � �
m a5 • r
.,.m �. �� /� �8 �
� t �� � °— � \ ,�.e� ROUND LAKE PARK � m'��
`� �d G.L. 4� 48�• \ SUBDIVISION / Ty� � k�� SQ{n/�
_-- - ��_ 5 �� �ors � rHRu so j � 42 �
JNNY PAULSON'S ��� �� *�� 16 � r� �NI
10RES GOLDEN GA7E � .,.,„� 47 s,..,,,�.,e �
JN00. CONDO. � � \ \� • 43 ' -
�� 6 �� -- - - �_m_�- _--- 15 ..,�_ � DEI
� , em \ --�—�� �- ,4
� \ . �...,�.� "' «.,.m..., -r� _-� 13 ..���.., � .
�PHIC SCALE \ � . �,� , �° �. ��--- �Z--,�._ _.r_._ �
� 7 +5 —_.'�------ „
\ � - .�� ,�y�� — — _
0 N00 1600 \
�� """"1"" � � � � Subdiv�sion Survey By: SAWYEf
\ � 8 9e�...��.� � •� / �\ .
� Survey Adjusted By: SCS w/S�
--- - -- - - \ • • � . Oriqinal Draw�ng Date: 12/25/
( IN FEET ) / \ \` �.*ys '*�' �C mpany�PoinREN�ORD��DEPnRI
inch = 400 ft. \ i pp� g
' �.
� o' � Drowing File Name: PM234108
nnneER�nNE � -�^-� Disk: NETWORK
CONDO. i
Tax Roll Date: 2004
Current Controller: LAND RECOF
Latest Revision Date/Init:
- — -- — - --- _ —_—' — — —_ — -- --- --
€
�
.. ', �
�
� _ _ , �
v �
_ m j. �
�
m �
� €
s
o g;,y�_ _ . �_. . __ f
o v.
.s___ _
� _ ��''''`� » _ � _ _.. �
�..J..
� � . . _
-� ....... _, ...,�... d . . . ;:. . .......�.. �
� �...� �
.. ._ ... ... ... .. .... ... ... . . ... .: . . . .._ _.... ..._ ,..... . . ';, .�.,.. ... ......... . �.�...__..., ,......... ._� ._,.. �
�
..,.. �.�rr�.....�..�...� (,G...., . , � � �
_ . _ . _ _ n__, __, `
_ . .. .��� . _. _._. . ..__,_».__�._..,. . ___.__
^� T" ? �`
_ _ _ � __- r_ _. _ . . .o..��,_..
� � � s _ Q
i _ _ - - --� -�----------� � _ �
�_ _ .
C�-- ; Z.� �
--- ---- -------------.�- - __ _ _ __ . . � _...� _ __� �___.__ ___._ - _�_�.
. _ .. _ _�_ _ € __
��LL
1
_ _ �? _.. . ,. ����.,_ �
� ;°, � �— �
; �
,
_ __. __._ _._____. �_ _„ __ .. �z .__..-..�._�.... �
___. }
� ...0
5� �
_ _ � _ . _. _
___ _._ .o..� ._..�t1___.._ ....�..
"� ;` �
� ___. {j� ,_ , _.� .,� . . �., �.. �. ..
� �
— � �
_ _ c� _ � . ._ __ . _ __ � ._.� �
..__� .._�
�,
_ � , _ .�'-_ _ _ . _.. _ .�. �_ .� �� . _.:.,.___'�__.... �
� � qs 7a cr� � �, �
-... � �
_ _ ..,,. .� , m . �._ � ._�__
� �.,,�.__ ��--
�
. .. ... .... ._. . .. ... ... __ . .. . . .. ... _� .. _ . _ .� . . ,..._, _.._.__.`....___�.—_.._ _> ,...,_.-. . . . �,�,_,..... .......�...�
�
�
.. ... . . .... . ..... .... .. .. _.. '\ .. _... �.����... ��� ,� __.. 7`.
... � . ... . , . .. .... �. � �
h ..w._" " '" �` _ .........�,�... ._.,
� ,� ` ,
� �
��
. .. .. . .. . .. ... ..... ... . . . . .,_ ,_... ....,� ��...... ., ....... .. . . ,_ .. ''�.
= .w .a,.__._..._._" �..' .-.._ ..ty..'"'_ _.___.._.
��
��
. . . . .. . . . .. .... ... .. .... ... .. , _ ... ,..,.__ .._.. _.... �.._.........««.,...,�.. _ .__.___..
� i
�i
� �
. ... . .. . . . ... . .. .. .., ._ .... . ._. _.. ..
uu
. _. , .,.. ..... _�_ .....» .....,..
� _ ...-,.._. . ,_,...
� '
z a � .i �
_ . . _ _. _W.... . ,.....
�
�
4 �s
. . . .... . . . . .... . ... .. . ..... ...... ........ ... ..... . . ..� ..... ,F�.......W_......_............. . ........
�+
. .. . . . ..... .. . . ..... :... .. .. .. � . . .. ........ .. .... ..,........., ............ .. �. � .
}>
#
�{ 1
{
. .. . ... . . .. .... ... . ..... ... . . ..... .... ... . . ..... ... ... .... '�„`......v.».. .-........... .... ..... j
�
�.
�;
...... .. .. . . . . .... .... . . .. ... . . .. ... .. .... ...... x. .................. .. .........,.�.,,. . . ....
`j 3
c
j. .
�
....... ,__..r.,� _,.�....._ .T , ._ .m... ..........._.......�_,,..�.. .,......_._........�_.._.,...__ ...,W�.__. -
_ , e._ . ...,...,. . .__.�..._ ..............,�...._._. .�..._._...,.».............�.
�
' ' " Town of Hayward _ ,,,�,�
. �r �,�
Sawyer County L; �'Y�r�����
;�F,{,� p�:� a
SUBJECT: Variance Application# 12-013 j '' OCT 15 2012 ��
��-�;� �:�'� TY
SA�'�� �.� u.��f�
TO: Sawyer County Zoning & Conservation Administration ZONiNG �Cs����s���TlON
10610 Main Suite#49
Hayward, WI 54843-0668
Owner(s): Frederick& Mary Clarke Residence Trust c% George Clarke, Trustee
Property Description: Part of Lot 38 and Part of Lot 39, Round Lake Park Subdivision; 523, T 41N, R 8W;
Parcel 3 803.
Acreage or Lot Size: 2.79
Property is zoned: Residential/Recreational One
Application is for: A reduced side lot line setback for an existing dwelling. Application has been made with
the Sawyer County Zoning Committee to create a new lot which would result in the dwellings side yard setback
of 5.2' at its closest point.
Variance is requested as: Section 18.4(a), Dimensional Requirements, Sawyer County Zoning Ordinance,
would require the prior granting of a variance for any structure located closer than 10' from one side lot line and
at least 30' from the other side lot line.
By Action of the Town Board, Variance is: ( Approved O Denied O Tabled
Public Hearing: September 18, 2012
Jeff uth, Chairman
� ry dart, Supervisor
�/ .f .���. ,.:C��
Har td`fiiffany, Supervisor
r
Dear 14lembers of the Town Board:
Your Town Board decision is an integral part of the decision making process for the Sawyer County Boazd of
Appeals. The Board of Appeals would like your cooperation in stating the reasons or comments why you
approved, denied, or tabled the variance application.
Re: Frederick& Mary Clarke Residence Trust c/o George Clarke
— nl o G+I A-iJ(.F. i,J Z o� � �i s-rR-�ct
S- n10 i D rl�G�r�(. -n> T� i o(- � S o P2oPEk�
� �J[ TQ S�E�IAL PD��i7/o�1 S UNI AJ(— � 7iC� J'R��ERT`�
Dated this��day of �C���sL(L ,20 � �_
L,Q' ��'�
Shannon O'Hare, Clerk
Office of
Sawyer County Zoning and Conservation
Administration
10610 Main Street Suite 49 r'� �
Hayward, Wisconsin 54843 n
(715) 634 8288 �
�.�.: :l�c�� ti`c11��: CiL�_�:ti?_t'�;C:�"� C��V"- • ��
E-maiL :�.�,�i<..cie��iit�i �a��vereolz�l��c�� a��
August 6, 2012
Frederick & Mary Clarke Residence Trust
c/o George Clarke, Trustee
4426 Chalfont Place
Bethesda, NID 20816
Re: Notice of Public Hearing date
Dear Mr. Clarke;
Your application for a variance will be considered at a Public Hearing before the Sawyer
County Zoning Board of Appeals on: Tuesday, September 18, 2012.
This hearing will begin at 6:00 P.M. at the Sawyer County Courthouse, 10610 Main,
Hayward, WI 54843. It is recommended that either you or a representative be present at
the Hearing. A lack of information about the situation may result in unnecessary delay of
a decision. Failure to appear may result in the denial of the application.
If it is impossible for a representative to be present, please submit a written statement to
this office directed to Alan Gerber, Chairman of the Board of Appeals. This statement
should include a description of the general terrain; surrounding development; your
proposed intentions; and the purpose of the request. Photographs of the property and/or
buildings are requested. Explain the undue zoning hardship inflicted upon the owner by
conforming to the required minimum regulation, which induced the variance request.
Convenience and financial loss or gain does not constitute a zoning hardship.
Your application will also go before the Town Board. Some townships also have a
Planning Commission. Please contact your Town Clerk Shannon O'Hare; 715/634-
4123 for the day and time of the Planning Commission and Town Board meetings so
you or your representative may appear.
Sawyer County Zoning & Conservation Administration
Oflice of
Sawyer County Zoning and Conservation Administration
]0610 Main Street Suice 49
Haywazd,Wisconsin 54843
(7I5)6348288
September 19,2012 _,
To:Town Clerk—Town of Haywazd
Re:Variance Application#12-013—Frederick&Mary Clarke Residence Trust
Notice is hereby given that on September 18,2012 the Sawyer County Zoning Board of Appeals
tabled/postponed the application for variance for the following proposal:
Town of Hayward-Frederick&Mary Clarke Residence Trust c/o George Clazke,Trustee Part of Lot 38
and Part of Lot 39,Round Lake Park Subdivision;523,T 41N,R 8W;Parcel 3803. Property has 2.79
acres.Properry is wned ResidentiaURecreatioual Onc.Application is for a reduced side lot line setback for
an existing dwelling.An application has been made with the Sawyer Counry Zoning Committee to create a
new lot wluch would result in ihe dwellings side yazd setback of S.Y at its closest point.Variancc is re-
quested as Section 18.4(a),Dimensional Requirements,Sawyer Counry Zoning Ordinance,would require
the prior granting of a variance for any structure located closer than 10'from one side lot line and at least
30'from the other side lot line.The Town Board has approved the application with comments.
The application has been tabled/postponed and placed on the October 16,2012 agenda of
the Board of Appeals to allow time for the Sawyer County Zoning Committee to hear the
variance request to create a substandard size lot.
The October 16`h Board of Appeals hearing will begin at 6:00 PM in the Sawyer County
Courthouse.
Any person or persons jointly aggrieved by this decision of the Boazd of Appeals may commence
an action in the Circuit Court for Writ of Certiorari to review the legality of this decision within
30 days after the date of this notice.
Yours truly,
� (�-�
Cindy Ya�kley� �
Deputy Zoning Administrator